PDA

View Full Version : Could "DEL" only delete selected take?


StepOne
02-06-2008, 08:28 PM
Instead of deleting all takes at once? This would mean that clicking on one take would only highlight that specific take (rather then all takes). It seems more straightforward behavior to do it that way.

Anyone else agree?

Dstruct
02-06-2008, 09:51 PM
i agree. makes more sense.

Art Evans
02-06-2008, 09:56 PM
Just use Delete Active Take. Enable "show all takes in lane" for ease of working.

StepOne
02-06-2008, 10:39 PM
I do use that option, but its a right click and a submenu away, whereas the del button is a directly accessible, single step :)

Art Evans
02-06-2008, 11:05 PM
... or just set up your own keyboard shortcut - there are in fact two 'actions', with or without confirmation, available for this.

StepOne
02-06-2008, 11:18 PM
... or just set up your own keyboard shortcut - there are in fact two 'actions', with or without confirmation, available for this.

I do know, my point was to suggest a slightly more intuitive approach, thats all.

One flew over
02-14-2008, 02:09 PM
I agree with StepOne. To me it seems like the most logic behaviour of pressing the DEL button.
+1

Tallisman
02-14-2008, 02:42 PM
agreed.

+1

.t

krom8
02-22-2008, 03:29 AM
Agreed. I wouldn't cuss at my monitor as much. +1

moss
02-22-2008, 05:20 AM
+1 Much more logical. I always press del, then undo then stumble around in the context menu :-/

boka
02-22-2008, 09:27 AM
+1 Much more logical.


+1 yeeaaahh!
just a question > in this case how could the entire multitake item be completely deleted in one step?


/boka

Argitoth
02-22-2008, 09:45 AM
+1 +1 +1 nDHJDF~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well Boka... you know it's kind of strange of Reaper not to be able to enable more than one take at a time. I guess it's also strange that you can't have selected more than one take.

CTRL + Clicking should be able to enable more than one take. Shift+clicking should function too. Drag+selecting should work also.

boka
02-24-2008, 11:48 PM
+1 +1 +1 nDHJDF~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well Boka... you know it's kind of strange of Reaper not to be able to enable more than one take at a time. I guess it's also strange that you can't have selected more than one take.

That'd be awesome if We could enable multiple takes at one time...

Tallisman
02-25-2008, 02:16 AM
rightclick a stack of takes --> item settings -->play takes

= more than one enabled no?

enable free item position mode.
rightclick a stack of takes --> explode in place select and mute as you please.

.tallis

doclike
02-25-2008, 03:17 AM
+1 for this...

I hate writing macros all the time ;)

This is sooooooo necessary!

doc

StepOne
02-26-2008, 10:20 AM
I do hope this gets implemented :)

along with the standard CTRL and Shift functionality for selecting multiple takes.

Fingle
02-27-2008, 04:52 PM
it would make things faster! +1

Primeval Mudd
02-27-2008, 05:05 PM
+1. I'm another that keeps on having to undo an accidental multi-take-deletion event.

Jae.Thomas
02-27-2008, 05:43 PM
what about pressing ctrl+del to do it or soemthing?

easily enough set up in the keycommands

but still

++1

Dstruct
02-27-2008, 05:59 PM
what about pressing ctrl+del to do it or soemthing?

but it would make more sense to have DEL just delete the selected take and something like CTRL+DEL to delete the whole item IMO.

would love this ...

Jae.Thomas
02-27-2008, 06:27 PM
but it would make more sense to have DEL just delete the selected take and something like CTRL+DEL to delete the whole item IMO.

would love this ...

actually you are totally right.

it makes sense that ONE key would delete ONE thing... and then a modifier would delete all.

stodge
02-28-2008, 06:32 AM
+1 from me!

Tallisman
02-28-2008, 10:13 AM
but it would make more sense to have DEL just delete the selected take and something like CTRL+DEL to delete the whole item IMO.

would love this ...

actually you are totally right!

:D
.t

tenkas
07-18-2008, 09:21 AM
++1

This one I miss from cubase

drew
07-21-2008, 11:18 AM
Yeah +1 here.. despite the mapping possibility I'd like to have Del mapped normally (focus dependent) and for it to behave as suggested.

schwa
07-21-2008, 11:39 AM
And when you really need to delete *everything*, you can use ctrl-alt-delete.

StepOne
07-21-2008, 01:03 PM
And when you really need to delete *everything*, you can use ctrl-alt-delete.

If only we were still using DOS :)

Till
07-22-2008, 09:25 AM
takes? i often get the feeling that people abuse 'takes' when what they should be using single take items in free item positioning mode ('select multiple takes', 'play all takes').

this is how i use takes: record, sucks, punch, sucks, ..., stop. listen to all takes, compare takes, select the best (least sucky) one, alt-shift-T, done.

if you go the other way around - always kick the worst take - the IMO that is such a repetitive task that a separate keystroke is very much fine.

and IF you bound 'delete active take' to DEL and 'delete item' to CTRL-DEL, there should be no problem: if you find out that you deleted just a take instead of the entire item(s), you don't have to undo. just remember ctrl-del, hit it, ease into the change, no pain.

Wilkesin
08-09-2008, 11:51 PM
Also have to +1

I pretty much avoid macros, changing commands etc. I feel like software should just work intuitively and largely Reaper does. I use some themes and changed the 'R' button to record instead of having to use cntrl+R, but other than that, I love the way Reaper is setup.

This is one of my few little nitpicks...

Susan G
08-20-2008, 11:35 AM
+1!

The current behavior took some getting used to, and it's such an obvious thing to want to do that it really shouldn't have, IMO. One of the things that made me go "Huh?", and I had to look it up!:) Any question or confusion about something as simple as this could be off-putting to someone just starting out with REAPER.

-Susan

Tallisman
08-20-2008, 12:22 PM
I think that the current dell functionality is good but needs some tweaking - the smart tool/cursor + an infusion of AI.

If the item has focus... delete the item, not the track.
if the item has takes... delete the active/selected take.
add alt to delete the inactive takes.


.t

mio*star
10-24-2008, 01:35 AM
++1

the simpler the better

Sonic Vampire
10-24-2008, 02:13 AM
+1 makes sense

drew
10-24-2008, 11:08 AM
I really hope this can become a pref setting.

hardplay
10-26-2008, 03:28 AM
I do know, my point was to suggest a slightly more intuitive approach, thats all.


Yes much easier
+1

synthie
11-09-2008, 09:33 AM
+1
It's the caveman's approach which I can sympathise with. See it, club it over the head, er, hit DEL, boof it's gone. Me want.

Thehaxx
11-14-2008, 10:42 PM
+1 FTW!

Yes can we please add this. I still find takes confusing and this was part of my initial frustration with them!

fiddler59
11-19-2008, 06:54 AM
Takes are still confusing as hell and have been since the beginning and I guess they always will be because the powers to be seem to ignore the threads relating to them. I think there must be something in the code base that prevents Cockos from addressing the takes issue......I hope i am wrong.

David Blackmon

fegi
11-19-2008, 09:01 AM
and here's my ++1 :)

zildjohn01
12-09-2008, 03:21 PM
+1 (plus one)

DerMetzgermeister
12-09-2008, 05:15 PM
+1

-------------

jas
12-09-2008, 06:04 PM
++1

might this be more intuitive?

del = delete current take (if time selected - delete current time selection of take)

ctrl+del = delete all takes (if time selected - delete all takes of current time selection)

labyrinth
12-10-2008, 08:46 AM
This is not a possible Feature Request, as you would not be able to delete items as most users would prefer. So, the only way to allow something like this is to have a modifier, such as CTRL + Delete do this.

StepOne
12-10-2008, 09:15 AM
This is not a possible Feature Request, as you would not be able to delete items as most users would prefer. So, the only way to allow something like this is to have a modifier, such as CTRL + Delete do this.

did I miss a poll?

jas
12-10-2008, 09:22 AM
Labyrinth's name reveals a deep "preference" for menus and sub menus.

labyrinth
12-11-2008, 07:57 AM
Labyrinth's name reveals a deep "preference" for menus and sub menus.

Sub-menus is right

jas
12-16-2008, 02:04 AM
Most users prefer fewer keystrokes. Also, more than an item or a range of items, please consider a range of selection for delete or any other form of edit.

Winfield
12-16-2008, 04:49 AM
++1.........



-W

zildjohn01
12-16-2008, 08:39 AM
The action "Remove items/tracks/env pts" can become "Remove items/takes/tracks/env pts"