View Single Post
Old 04-21-2014, 04:58 PM   #30
AmmoniumNitrate
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by karbomusic View Post
Right, audio, about hearing, not reading about hearing; after 30-40 years of it, I've read about it until I'm blue in the face. I'd prefer to hear it than read someone else try to prove I do and that mean's I shouldn't even trust myself because bias is a very, very real thing. If you don't find use in it, I have no dog it the fight; it was an offer to help, nothing more, carry on.
I'm all for a double-blind trial to resolve this controversy. But how would we even wonder to hearing-test oversampling if it weren't for someone writing about it in the first place? I just want you to find peace with the choice you are making of your own free will to read writing about audio.

In my case, I'd already shelled out an arm and a leg for a Waves EQ which didn't do oversampling, and when I eventually tried out some oversampling EQ's which were much cheaper, if not free, I retired my expensive Waves EQ; whatever that says about bias.
AmmoniumNitrate is offline   Reply With Quote