Quote:
Originally Posted by EricM
When people invest a lot of money and their time in developing an efficient workflow using particular hardware, and than comes another software solution that is supposedly much better / efficient, but it does not support their hardware, it cannot be considered as a viable option anymore.
|
Sure. But in my book, having invested in a closed system using proprietary protocols for communication does not warrant any claim to be more professional than people who care more about interoperability, avoiding dependency on a single vendor and lock-in to inferior standards. It's actually rather the other way around.
(PS: Sorry for eating your line-breaks, EricM.
)