I just hate it when people imply things that are false and sidetrack a discussion. Especially when it's already been explained and clearly dimissed as not factual 17 times already in the very same thread.
Now show me any example of any track based system given here as an example that's "homogenized", the false implication of a result titling your post.
Jeez.
At any rate, if you explain something in detail multiple times and people persist implying that the thing that clearly isn't true, and is of no concern, actually is a potential concern, yes, it becomes nonsensical at some point.
Last edited by Lawrence; 07-17-2012 at 11:06 AM.
|