|
|
|
03-15-2008, 02:43 PM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
New JS Limiter
New JS Limiter: http://loser.asseca.com/MGA_JSLimiter
which is IMO, very good and has GR meter.
Enjoy.
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 05:42 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: decepticon mothership in a hidden place inside a mountain
Posts: 3,754
|
Another one ?
Thank you !
(gain reduction meters... mmmmh, i like that !)
How does this one compare to... well... the hundreds you already made ?
What would you advice it for ?
|
|
|
03-15-2008, 07:29 PM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 84
|
Ack! LOSER, you are out of control Going through your JS stuff is like Christmas every time. Thanks!
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 01:46 AM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinkmusic
Another one ?
Thank you !
(gain reduction meters... mmmmh, i like that !)
How does this one compare to... well... the hundreds you already made ?
What would you advice it for ?
|
It's basically very similar to my NULL Limiter (VST). (BTW Sink you can enter the -120dB manually in the JS version hehe).
So what to use it for? - Just put it on the master instead of all other JS limiters . Seriously it's REALLY good (IMO) (and I haven't claimed that about my previous creations). Also I'm very much satisfied with this (which I also never really was with previous creations). I can't think of a single thing to change to improve it (well actually I can, though I won't give away the code for that).
So to sum it up ... I'd personally pick this limiter over any other freeware limiter out there, including the much loved W1 Limiter and also Baricade, EventHorizon.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 11:30 AM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spain,
Posts: 134
|
HiLOSER!
Thanks man, "pa la cole"
Salut!
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 02:37 PM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,008
|
I'm probably stupid, but do we download this from somewhere? The link in the first post just leads to some text.
__________________
"Mah blahkinned sole izz daw-kaw thawn thah blahkissed nye-eeeet!!!"
SQUONK SQUONK SQUEE!!! SQUIDONK SQUIDONK DONK SQUEE!!!
"Thah daaahhhk of thah nye-eeeet izz lye-eeek my-eee sole-aaah!!!"
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 02:49 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 991
|
*cough**cough*
__________________
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta.
Last edited by StepOne; 03-16-2008 at 03:54 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 03:15 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mind Riot
I'm probably stupid, but do we download this from somewhere? The link in the first post just leads to some text.
|
Just save the file (as a text file with out extension, as it is) into your REAPER/effects/LOSER/ folder.
It then will show up in REAPER in the JS fx section.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 03:54 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 991
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
Just save the file (as a text file with out extension, as it is) into your REAPER/effects/LOSER/ folder.
It then will show up in REAPER in the JS fx section.
|
well that works much better
__________________
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 03:58 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 991
|
first impressions are that it sounds damn fine! Great work, and thanks!
__________________
Damn it feels good to be a gangsta.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: decepticon mothership in a hidden place inside a mountain
Posts: 3,754
|
I like it : it is not "just" a limiter, and like the Null one, it offers few parameters but great versatilty.
THank you.
Would auto-release make sense on this one (your JS Master limiter had this feature) ?
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 06:01 PM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mcr:uk
Posts: 3,889
|
Thanks LOSER. I'm looking forward to trying this.
|
|
|
03-16-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney Oz
Posts: 8,480
|
Shit LOSER...that actually sounds really good! Thanks for sharing it.
|
|
|
03-17-2008, 12:45 AM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,008
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
Just save the file (as a text file with out extension, as it is) into your REAPER/effects/LOSER/ folder.
It then will show up in REAPER in the JS fx section.
|
Ah, I see. Thank you.
__________________
"Mah blahkinned sole izz daw-kaw thawn thah blahkissed nye-eeeet!!!"
SQUONK SQUONK SQUEE!!! SQUIDONK SQUIDONK DONK SQUEE!!!
"Thah daaahhhk of thah nye-eeeet izz lye-eeek my-eee sole-aaah!!!"
|
|
|
03-17-2008, 06:21 AM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mcr:uk
Posts: 3,889
|
Well to my untrained ears, this thing sounds bloody great. Bow down to the mighty mind of LOSER!
|
|
|
03-17-2008, 02:36 PM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 200
|
Holy shit man! I'm not sure what's going on there but it sounds fantastic!
|
|
|
03-17-2008, 02:51 PM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Medford, OR
Posts: 1,207
|
*COUGH* please include this in the installer *COUGH*
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 08:10 AM
|
#18
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 562
|
I like it, just tried it out briefly, great results.
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 10:27 AM
|
#19
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,721
|
I dig this limiter on overheads heheh... it'll be in 2.150
-Justin
|
|
|
03-18-2008, 02:17 PM
|
#20
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: In church, burning it down
Posts: 1,345
|
I'm gonna do GUI cause this thing is cool
But somebody else will have to step up to do the code
NAS
__________________
Not Gods or Saints but HUMAN be
|
|
|
03-19-2008, 10:44 AM
|
#21
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Thanks guys for all the kind words. I modified the original limiter and branced out a dual mono limiter with adjustable linking between the 2 channels: http://loser.asseca.com/MGA_JSLimiterST
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 07:55 AM
|
#22
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in a hotel room near you
Posts: 1,175
|
This is very nice: I think the stereo link feature works superbly.
Loser, i'm having some issues with bass distortion, although the general sound is better than some others I have.
Can you think of any way to combat this, given the operational principal of the limiter itself. I'm pushing quite hard though, at 6db gain reduction, so i should really back off a bit, but i'm left wondering why limiters like the tc md3 brickwall don't have (too many) bass distortion issues.
Any chance of an auto release.. I'm forever faffing about with the release times on these things, and most autos now do a better job than me.
Anyway, thank you for this. It sounds damn fine as it is, and I love the convenience of having this in a JS. Quality!
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 08:28 AM
|
#23
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by griz lee
This is very nice: I think the stereo link feature works superbly.
Loser, i'm having some issues with bass distortion, although the general sound is better than some others I have.
Can you think of any way to combat this, given the operational principal of the limiter itself. I'm pushing quite hard though, at 6db gain reduction, so i should really back off a bit, but i'm left wondering why limiters like the tc md3 brickwall don't have (too many) bass distortion issues.
Any chance of an auto release.. I'm forever faffing about with the release times on these things, and most autos now do a better job than me.
Anyway, thank you for this. It sounds damn fine as it is, and I love the convenience of having this in a JS. Quality!
|
Well auto release is a tough one, because it means calculating the release time dynamically based on overtime, frequency density in the various ranges, etc... so, sorry, but no. If you want pseudo auto release just leave it at its default setting and it should be okay.
Regarding the low frequency distortion, well with the algorithm this limiter is based on its a compromise between high frequency responsiveness vs low frequency distortion, and I think that the way it is right now is a good compromise. Also if you are talking about the limiter from the tc electronic MD3 Stereo Mastering bundle then you must know that that bundle, which only contains 2 plug-ins costs around 1000 bucks, so you'd expect it to be good. Also for the $1000 they don't give away their source code, right?
I mean there is nothing super secret in the code itself, though like I said this is as far as I'll go giving stuff away for free that's really supposed to have a price tag. This is really about empowering people, well people that use REAPER anyway, so they get some decent quality FX to mix with. This isn't about replacing commercial plug-ins here (I don't really want to anyway). Commercial plug-ins are for people actually making a living with audio. This here is really just a gift to anyone wanting a decent limiter, but can't affort doesn't want (because recording is only a hobby) to spend any money on it.
So you must understand this. You aren't recording your clients for free either, do you?
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 08:54 AM
|
#24
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in a hotel room near you
Posts: 1,175
|
I totally understand your point. Also, I know the price of the TC to which i'm making a comparison, but source code complexity doesn't really come into it. A good algo is a good algo, be it a few lines or a few thousand.
I'm willing to bet some uber-price products sometimes only contain a few lines of code with a really glitzy retro interface strapped on !!
Based on what I hear, i'd also wager that some EQ's i've purchased previously in the bad-old-days (pre Reaper) are in fact only re-hased RBJ algos.
I can see that it's complex argument, particularly if you need to make your living from software. This won't stop people asking for new features unfortunately, but you've got to remember that most folk around here probably absolutely respect the work you've done and are very grateful for the free products you've released.
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 09:15 AM
|
#25
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by griz lee
I totally understand your point. Also, I know the price of the TC to which i'm making a comparison, but source code complexity doesn't really come into it. A good algo is a good algo, be it a few lines or a few thousand.
I'm willing to bet some uber-price products sometimes only contain a few lines of code with a really glitzy retro interface strapped on !!
Based on what I hear, i'd also wager that some EQ's i've purchased previously in the bad-old-days (pre Reaper) are in fact only re-hased RBJ algos.
I can see that it's complex argument, particularly if you need to make your living from software. This won't stop people asking for new features unfortunately, but you've got to remember that most folk around here probably absolutely respect the work you've done and are very grateful for the free products you've released.
|
Well good code is certainly short, but my point was that TC electronic doesn't give there source code away (in JS you have to! no matter what). If this wasn't a JS but a VST I'd totally would try to improve the low frequency distortion, but it isn't.
Also btw regarding the RBJ "algorithm", it is really just a methode of calculating the filter coefficients of second-order IIR filters, which I'm pretty sure everyone who has got the math and dsp skills for it can calculate on his/her own .
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 09:30 AM
|
#26
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: in a hotel room near you
Posts: 1,175
|
It's ok Loser, nobody is asking you to do anything you don't want to do or can't justify economically - i was trying to be careful to make that point but it appears to have gone wrong somewhere down the line.
I'm a bit dazzled by the sound quality of some of the JS available: there really is some very sophisticated 'high price' stuff in there if you like.
I'm going to jump off this particular ship here, just to say 'thanks for a great limiter'.
|
|
|
03-20-2008, 10:23 AM
|
#27
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by griz lee
It's ok Loser, nobody is asking you to do anything you don't want to do or can't justify economically - i was trying to be careful to make that point but it appears to have gone wrong somewhere down the line.
I'm a bit dazzled by the sound quality of some of the JS available: there really is some very sophisticated 'high price' stuff in there if you like.
I'm going to jump off this particular ship here, just to say 'thanks for a great limiter'.
|
Hey its all cool. Just wait until my new VST stuff is coming out to see some REALLY amazing stuff .
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 03:46 PM
|
#28
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,716
|
whoa! michael, this DOES sound good. Thanks!
oh, and while i'm thinking about it, i also tried your StereoWithLimiter today. nicely done!
tj
__________________
It may be the devil, or it may be the Lord, but you're gonna hafta serve somebody.
__________________
|
|
|
03-21-2008, 05:30 PM
|
#29
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
Well good code is certainly short, but my point was that TC electronic doesn't give there source code away (in JS you have to! no matter what).
|
Maybe we should have an International Obfuscated JS Code Contest to catch up to the C crowd
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 02:29 AM
|
#30
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,083
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
Hey its all cool. Just wait until my new VST stuff is coming out to see some REALLY amazing stuff .
|
Hey Michael,
I'm doing exactly that!
JS Limiter: Really like it. This is good stuff.
Man, you definitely built up a good reputation in the past which makes me to like to buy your "REALLY amazing stuff" if it is really that much better as you say.
Shogger
P.S. Any time frame for the "REALLY amazing stuff"?
|
|
|
03-22-2008, 03:42 AM
|
#31
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shogger
Hey Michael,
I'm doing exactly that!
JS Limiter: Really like it. This is good stuff.
Man, you definitely built up a good reputation in the past which makes me to like to buy your "REALLY amazing stuff" if it is really that much better as you say.
Shogger
P.S. Any time frame for the "REALLY amazing stuff"?
|
Well to some they might not necessary sound better, but they are/will definitifly cleaner, more transparent and in a way more surgical. Just imagine my precious plug-ins were boxers, operating on brute force, than my new ones will be ninjas, silently, undetectable, deadly, underestimated little folks with no-frills, or something like that anyway .
The time-frame currently looks something like spending alot of my spare time finishing my new dsp/plug-in framework, so they will be done when they're done.
Last edited by LOSER; 03-22-2008 at 03:48 AM.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 10:05 AM
|
#32
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 642
|
Hello
This is very promising sounding limiter.
However, I'm having strange problem with this, and even stranger is that nobody else has mentioned about it so far...??
The threshold and ceiling sliders only work at their min and max positions, but not between. When I try to move it, it just jumps to either position..
Is there a way to fix this?
Also, if there is supposed to be a gain reduction meter (graphics), it doesn't work either. Only numerical value show up.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 11:42 AM
|
#33
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anomaly
Hello
This is very promising sounding limiter.
However, I'm having strange problem with this, and even stranger is that nobody else has mentioned about it so far...??
[...]
|
Because noone expirenced it so far?
Anyway here is how it should look like and here (and I bet for the majority of all the others) it works:
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 02:14 PM
|
#34
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 37
|
Like the rest, thanks for the awesome new limiter. It's my new go-to limiter.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 03:02 PM
|
#35
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 642
|
Hello Loser,
Yes, I figured that out it might my private special issue. Probably there's some solar spot activity at the moment, or something...
However, I have no idea why that problem occurs in my system. It seems like JS doesn't allow slider steps smaller than 1 under some conditions. Release slider works fine.
And no, the graphics doesn't look like that here either.
But thanks anyway..
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 04:46 PM
|
#36
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Down Under
Posts: 2,148
|
Hi LOSER
Realy like this limiter, and appreciate your generousity.
Sorry if this is a stupid question but what is the purpose of the link stereo slider ? and how should it be used for best results.
Cheers
Wolffman
Last edited by Wolffman; 03-23-2008 at 04:47 PM.
Reason: can't spell
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 05:03 PM
|
#37
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anomaly
Hello Loser,
Yes, I figured that out it might my private special issue. Probably there's some solar spot activity at the moment, or something...
However, I have no idea why that problem occurs in my system. It seems like JS doesn't allow slider steps smaller than 1 under some conditions. Release slider works fine.
And no, the graphics doesn't look like that here either.
But thanks anyway..
|
Weird . Could it be that you edited the files or maybe it got corrupted? Could you get it again and see? Because it definitifly works fine here.
|
|
|
03-23-2008, 05:08 PM
|
#38
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolffman
Hi LOSER
Realy like this limiter, and appreciate your generousity.
Sorry if this is a stupid question but what is the purpose of the link stereo slider ? and how should it be used for best results.
Cheers
Wolffman
|
I links the 2 channels. That means with link set to 0% both channels get compressed independently from each other, as if you'd have two limiters, one for each stereo channel. While with link set to 100% both channels get compressed equally with the identical gain reduction.
So e.g. you have material where one channel has lots of transients while the other channel hasn't you'd unlink the two (set link to something <100%), so the channel without the transients doesn't pump.
|
|
|
03-24-2008, 01:21 AM
|
#39
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
Weird . Could it be that you edited the files or maybe it got corrupted? Could you get it again and see? Because it definitifly works fine here.
|
I tried re-downloading it, but that didn't help.
The fix was just to try it again later, and then it suddenly started to work. So it's definitely some solar action going on..
Cheers
|
|
|
08-12-2016, 01:55 AM
|
#40
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
|
Could someone please re-upload this script?
The site is down, searching the stash gives me only a GUI for that.
It would be very interesting to take a look at another take on limiting.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 PM.
|