|
|
|
02-13-2017, 12:32 PM
|
#41
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 8,676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by schwa
By design .. the pooled copy you drew just isn't long enough to see the right hand edge point.
|
But why does it move the point instead of the segment?
__________________
Pressure is what turns coal into diamonds - Michael a.k.a. Runaway
|
|
|
02-13-2017, 05:12 PM
|
#42
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Whales, UK
Posts: 6,009
|
trying to rename one AI (only one selected) (from r click rename dialog) that is pooled, to a new name changes all the pooled items names too:
expected: change just the one name so it isn't pooled anymore when r-clicking a single AI.
(from the AI properties 'all pooled copies rename' section i'd expect that to rename all the pooled ai's)
or: how i do unpool otherwise?
btw it also seems rather easy to have all/more than one AI selected and yield unexpected tweaks.
locking will probably need to apply in some way to AI's also before it goes wild
Last edited by BenK-msx; 02-13-2017 at 05:27 PM.
|
|
|
02-13-2017, 10:42 PM
|
#43
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 113
|
I can't change my envelope like normal. Not sure if this is related to the new Automation Items feature.
Behaviors:
* When editing a project file created in a version before 5.34prex and trying to drag an envelope line up or down it will attempt to adjust the "tension" instead of adjusting the volume. It gives me a different cursor with sideways arrows.
* When I create a new envelope in this same old session file and drag it up/down it will give me the same sideways arrows but it will adjust the volume instead as expected. It will not however respect a time selection and only adjust the part inside the time selection as it did in 5.33.
Please let me know if you need a sample RPP or any other info or if I'm just missing something simple. Thanks!
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 03:09 AM
|
#44
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
Posts: 8,676
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb945
I can't change my envelope like normal. Not sure if this is related to the new Automation Items feature.
Behaviors:
* When editing a project file created in a version before 5.34prex and trying to drag an envelope line up or down it will attempt to adjust the "tension" instead of adjusting the volume. It gives me a different cursor with sideways arrows.
* When I create a new envelope in this same old session file and drag it up/down it will give me the same sideways arrows but it will adjust the volume instead as expected. It will not however respect a time selection and only adjust the part inside the time selection as it did in 5.33.
Please let me know if you need a sample RPP or any other info or if I'm just missing something simple. Thanks!
|
Mouse modifiers changed. Check them.
__________________
Pressure is what turns coal into diamonds - Michael a.k.a. Runaway
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 03:33 AM
|
#45
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
Spectogram - when using zoom tool with any of its ends inside an item, spectrogram turns on.
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 03:44 AM
|
#46
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
New "Envelope lane -> left drag" is missing some actions for a time selection manipulation. Previously I had this context set the same as the "Track -> left drag" context.
And also a double-click is missing, at least for me.
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 06:26 AM
|
#47
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,340
|
Thank ypu
Devs,
Thank you sooo much for allowing ultra high frequencies in AI LFO.
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 07:47 AM
|
#48
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 794
|
Hi, I saw the LFO options and they seem pretty basic to me. There are scripts that are already more flexible/complete than that (see attached).
I believe (and would suggest) that if Reaper embeds an LFO function it should be natively on par or better than what we already have as scripts..
Just my thoughts (hope at leat I'll still be able to keep using that script on the AI)
g
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 08:33 AM
|
#49
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,340
|
Regarding Gianfini's post,
I too would love to see those abilities added to AI LFO or at least allow scripts to influence the AI (hopefully this can be done without requiring scripters to update their scripts?)
Also, currently SWS extension envelope actions don't work on AIs, so hopefully this can be fixed as well.
Thanks
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 09:09 AM
|
#50
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 15,749
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercado_Negro
But why does it move the point instead of the segment?
|
Ah, that's a bug. Fixed for the next build, thanks for the followup!
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 09:12 AM
|
#51
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 15,749
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb945
* When editing a project file created in a version before 5.34prex and trying to drag an envelope line up or down it will attempt to adjust the "tension" instead of adjusting the volume. It gives me a different cursor with sideways arrows.
|
Could you post a screenshot of your envelope segment mouse modifiers?
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 09:17 AM
|
#52
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,721
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bFooz
Spectogram - when using zoom tool with any of its ends inside an item, spectrogram turns on.
|
If you are zoomed-out and there are no spectrogram reapeaks built, it won't show spectrograms. If you zoom in to a threshold where it realtime-calculates spectrograms, then they become visible. Either rebuild peaks while spectrogram is enabled for this item, or disable spectrograms...
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 09:57 AM
|
#53
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
If you are zoomed-out and there are no spectrogram reapeaks built, it won't show spectrograms. If you zoom in to a threshold where it realtime-calculates spectrograms, then they become visible. Either rebuild peaks while spectrogram is enabled for this item, or disable spectrograms...
|
Oh, I see. It's reacting to HORIZONTAL zooming.
It could also watch the vertical zoom level and hide spectrum for tracks with small height (like item icons).
|
|
|
02-14-2017, 01:46 PM
|
#55
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton9
Regarding Gianfini's post,
I too would love to see those abilities added to AI LFO or at least allow scripts to influence the AI (hopefully this can be done without requiring scripters to update their scripts?)
Also, currently SWS extension envelope actions don't work on AIs, so hopefully this can be fixed as well.
Thanks
|
Can't lie.. I would love an envelope for rate too!
Amplitude can kind of be done now by adding in a second envelope item.
but, I do love the rate options we have now as well as they are very useful and get you most of the way there. Just need envelopes if possible as well
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 04:36 AM
|
#56
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 6950 DK
Posts: 659
|
What witchcraft is this??? I need this tool. What is it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gianfini
Hi, I saw the LFO options and they seem pretty basic to me. There are scripts that are already more flexible/complete than that (see attached).
I believe (and would suggest) that if Reaper embeds an LFO function it should be natively on par or better than what we already have as scripts..
Just my thoughts (hope at leat I'll still be able to keep using that script on the AI)
g
|
__________________
REAPING HAVOC SINCE 2008
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 06:18 AM
|
#57
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 7,924
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin
...If you zoom in to a threshold where it realtime-calculates spectrograms, then they become visible. Either rebuild peaks while spectrogram is enabled for this item, or disable spectrograms...
|
Lightbulb! -re high-res peaks...
This is making sense to me why you were resistant to increase the spectrogram resolution, even per item, I presumed that the spectrogram "peaks" were all precalculated and that the performance hit would be at peak calculation time only. I didn't appreciate that (like nomal waveform peaks) at high zooms, it is calculated live. My apologies for not grasping this fact.
Is it possible to extend the spectrogram peaks file spec to optionally calculate to a higher resolution that operates at all zoom levels please - for requested items only?
I appreciate that this will generate very large peak files, but the need for this would be for specific (usually problem) items only, and would be best invoked per item on demand. Give the user option to release the peak to normal resolution (and free-up the file-space) afterwards and I think it could be workable.
The present prerelease (blanket) method is fantastic and perfect for 90+% of work (my workflow), I'm just trying to defer the need to swap to specialsied tools for most of the remaining problem stuff.
Many thanks for listening.
>
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 07:00 AM
|
#58
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by uksnowy
What witchcraft is this??? I need this tool. What is it?
|
I checked ReaPack yeasterday and found this tool there.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 07:13 AM
|
#59
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South, UK
Posts: 14,214
|
This!
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetnine
Lightbulb! -re high-res peaks...
This is making sense to me why you were resistant to increase the spectrogram resolution, even per item, I presumed that the spectrogram "peaks" were all precalculated and that the performance hit would be at peak calculation time only. I didn't appreciate that (like nomal waveform peaks) at high zooms, it is calculated live. My apologies for not grasping this fact.
Is it possible to extend the spectrogram peaks file spec to optionally calculate to a higher resolution that operates at all zoom levels please - for requested items only?
I appreciate that this will generate very large peak files, but the need for this would be for specific (usually problem) items only, and would be best invoked per item on demand. Give the user option to release the peak to normal resolution (and free-up the file-space) afterwards and I think it could be workable.
The present prerelease (blanket) method is fantastic and perfect for 90+% of work (my workflow), I'm just trying to defer the need to swap to specialsied tools for most of the remaining problem stuff.
Many thanks for listening.
>
|
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM.
|