|
|
|
02-15-2017, 06:39 AM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 135
|
Rea(X)Comp and ReaEQ Update
The resizing feature was a step further to be some way up-to-date with the oem plugs.
But dont stay still, Cockos
ReaComp:
A Range Control, to adjust the max. gain reduction amount and a hold control. Both useful for external sidechaining. better autogain
ReaEQ:
mid/side, left/right processing, auto gain.
ReaXcomp:
adjustable steepness of the filter frequencies, Range Control, for each band. better autogain
Thank you
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 07:06 AM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
+1 for this
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 08:55 AM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 13,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by earforce
ReaEQ:
mid/side, left/right processing, auto gain.
|
+1. Bands monitoring would be also great.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 11:03 AM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 394
|
+1 yes please.
.
.
__________________
16" M1Pro MacBook Pro, 32gig ram, 1TB ssd, macOS 14
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 11:51 AM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 791
|
Also very useful would be the addition of band type based upon where it is inserted, as in IIEQ and Equilibrium.
Single left-click in the case of IIEQ, or double left-click with Equilibrium
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 11:54 AM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 13,333
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lachrimae
Also very useful would be the addition of band type based upon where it is inserted, as in IIEQ and Equilibrium.
|
Ok, what about situation, when I need to insert Band point at Bass Spectrum range?
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 12:02 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 791
|
Edit: Alternatively you could create the high-pass or Low-Shelf (depending on where you inserted) and then change it to Peak or whatever else you need via the right-click menu, but it's faster just to create the Peak band between 100Hz and 4K and drag it over.
Last edited by lachrimae; 02-15-2017 at 12:08 PM.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 12:19 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 791
|
Here's some more detail in case it's of use:
Equilibrum
10-20Hz HPF
20-100Hz Low-Shelf
100Hz-4K Peak
4-10K High-Shelf
10-20K LPF
Notch is created if a point is inserted at the very bottom of the window.
IIEQ
16-35Hz HPF
35-67Hz Low-Shelf
68Hz-5.2K Peak
5.2-11K High-Shelf
11-22K LPF
Notch is created if a point is inserted at the very bottom of the window.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 12:42 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,891
|
I haven't run into any problems with ReaEq yet. I could use any EQ in the world but I just use ReaEQ.
Far more important to me would be something like Tabs inside ReaSamplomatic5000.
So, I'm not convinced ReaEQ needs this.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 03:11 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by earforce
ReaEQ:
mid/side, left/right processing, auto gain.
|
I'll add a +1 to this too.
As has been mentioned many times, a slope control (continuously variable from 3dB/oct to at least 48 dB/oct would be wonderful) for the LP & HP filters would be great too. I know we can stack them to create steeper slopes but it is a less than ideal workaround IMHO.
|
|
|
02-15-2017, 06:32 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 7,293
|
We've been through this...
Quote:
Originally Posted by earforce
ReaEQ:
mid/side
|
As is, there wouldn't be any difference in the way it is displayed or works, except that it would maybe do the encode/decode thing on its own, which is kind of superfluous when we have other plugs to do that. I know, I know, you want it all in one place so you don't have to use other plugs, but frankly that is kind of against the whole modular nature of the Reaper paradigm.
You mean like to be able to EQ each side differently? That sounds like a mess and a half to me and not actually better than just using two instances of ReaEQ (see again "modular nature"). If this is also what you meant by mid/side, well then they're really the same request, no?
I can't imagine how you'd even start to do that with an EQ since the overall level change depends on how much of the original content falls into the range of the bands, and...
I'm not completely sure what folks want from "adjustable slope" that isn't covered by the bandwidth control. Aside from the fact that it's labeled differently, I'm pretty sure it does the same thing.
Anyway, my couple pennies:
I would love it if ReaEQ would process more than two channels at a time for those instances where I really want to apply the same curve to a bunch of stuff, but don't want to mix them together first.
I also think that the phase display is weird. I'm not completely convinced that it adds all of the phase change from different bands correctly, and I think it had ought to wrap around at multiples of 360 rather than just heading toward infinity.
|
|
|
02-16-2017, 01:02 AM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt
You mean like to be able to EQ each side differently? That sounds like a mess and a half to me and not actually better than just using two instances of ReaEQ
|
It's actually quite simple to represent graphically. There are many third party EQ plugins that do this. ReaEQ could simply use a different colour to display the left/right curve.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt
I can't imagine how you'd even start to do that with an EQ since the overall level change depends on how much of the original content falls into the range of the bands, and...
|
Once again, there are numerous third party EQ plugins that do this successfully. SlickEQ does it very nicely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt
I'm not completely sure what folks want from "adjustable slope" that isn't covered by the bandwidth control. Aside from the fact that it's labeled differently, I'm pretty sure it does the same thing.
|
The issue with the bandwidth control is that it creates a resonant peak as it is narrowed. That isn't a bug and it is different to an adjustable slope control.
If you stack multiple filters on top of each other at the same frequency, you can achieve the desired non resonant slope but it is a messy and inefficient way to do things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt
Anyway, my couple pennies:
I would love it if ReaEQ would process more than two channels at a time for those instances where I really want to apply the same curve to a bunch of stuff, but don't want to mix them together first.
|
There's a four channel version of ReaEQ on LoL but it is older and doesn't have the resize tweaks.
Perhaps Justin/Schwa could update this one and include it in the official REAPER package.
If it could be made to process even more than four channels, that would be even better. I use the LoL version often for Ambisonic purposes.
|
|
|
02-16-2017, 01:21 AM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 190
|
ReaEQ
+1 for a built-in M/S or L/R mode, dedicated solo/focus function, and various slope options.
Perhaps make the grid draggable vertically, and not limited to 12 db with the tabs shown and 18 db with tabs hidden.
...and a button to turn off the spectrum.
|
|
|
02-16-2017, 01:22 AM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 135
|
It is already said, a lot of requested features can be seen in free oder commercial plugins, so technical side is no problem. Sure, mentioned wishes can be done with other Reaper/JS plugs, but it is all about convenience.
But i dont expect the replugins have all the same features as commercial plugs from fabfilter, izotope etc. But the basics standard increased over the time.
On the other hand, there was much work on features for only a few customers, like Notation. EQ and compressor is used from everybody.
|
|
|
02-16-2017, 01:31 AM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,598
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crimsonmerry
ReaEQ
Perhaps make the grid draggable vertically, and not limited to 12 db with the tabs shown and 18 db with tabs hidden.
|
A BIG +1 to this.
|
|
|
02-21-2017, 02:05 PM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
|
I might be alone in requesting this esoteric feature, but it is just a huge necessity after pretty much using ReaEQ and only ReaEQ as my go-to equalizer. The ability to adjust how much of the floor is visible on the spectrum analyzer. Perhaps it is simply my lack of desire in adjusting my workflow/dependency on the limited range that the old ReaEQ displayed, but I honestly really miss it as it messes with my sense of sound and EQing.
Perhaps a "legacy" option (like ReaFir has) to switch between the newer modern range of display and the old version? It would be great to have an option for those who have gotten used to the way ReaEQ's spectrum analyzer used to look. Am I alone in wanting this?
|
|
|
02-22-2017, 03:19 AM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 2,588
|
ReaEQ - Multichannel processing, preferably unlimited.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 PM.
|