Quote:
I always play in 48khz-24 bit. Now my question is, will rendering in 96khz will give me a better render?
|
No.
If you are distributing your music, you'll probably be distributing MP3, AAC, or CD... formats that anyone can play, and you don't need high resolution for that. But, for "marketing" reasons you may want to distribute an optional-additional high-resolution FLAC.*
The guys who've done scientific, blind, level-matched
ABX tests have pretty-much demonstrated that "CD quality" (16-bit 44.1 kHz) is better than human hearing and you can't hear any difference with anything "better".
There are so many things that affect sound that even if you can hear a tiny-tiny difference in a careful A/B listening test, that's about the last thing to worry about.
(And presumably, your listeners will only have one version so they can't A/B anyway...
If you record in 24/96 and you're sending your recording out for mastering (or if you are doing a separate mastering step yourself) it's "good practice" to maintain the highest quality until the final render. And, you might want to maintain a high-resolution "archive master".
* Some artists/producers release will a less dynamically-compressed (non-loudness-war) high-resolution version, but the truth is that CD & MP3 are adequate for the more dynamic release. But it's marketing, so give the customers what they want!