Domien
02-27-2020, 08:18 AM
I've been using Reaper for a long time now and I'm running into an issue for the first time.
I have a project with 60+ tracks with many VSTi's on them. This projects uses about 35% CPU but runs very smooth. For a live performance, I'm working together with a friend who uses Ableton. He has all the original reaper MIDI items in Ableton and sends them over MIDI to my system for playback. I've already reduced the project to 10 tracks with only the most important VSTi's (mainly Massive and Battery instances) so now it uses about 6% cpu. However, the playback quickly starts crackling, as if the incoming MIDI can't be timely handled.
I'm running a Windows 10 laptop, 12 GB RAM, Core I7 (3 years old). RME UCX interface over USB. When I reduced the buffersize from 128 to 512 this clearly improved the situation but still. I don't understand why the buffersize should be set that high, when in 128 i can easily record 10 tracks of audio without a problem, but a tiny MIDI signal needs a ridiculously high buffersize. I can't set it even higher because at the same time (for the live performance) I'm also running puredata and that's quite sensitive about the buffersizes, it doesn't like 1024 at all...
Am I missing something here or does anyone have experience with this.
Domien
I have a project with 60+ tracks with many VSTi's on them. This projects uses about 35% CPU but runs very smooth. For a live performance, I'm working together with a friend who uses Ableton. He has all the original reaper MIDI items in Ableton and sends them over MIDI to my system for playback. I've already reduced the project to 10 tracks with only the most important VSTi's (mainly Massive and Battery instances) so now it uses about 6% cpu. However, the playback quickly starts crackling, as if the incoming MIDI can't be timely handled.
I'm running a Windows 10 laptop, 12 GB RAM, Core I7 (3 years old). RME UCX interface over USB. When I reduced the buffersize from 128 to 512 this clearly improved the situation but still. I don't understand why the buffersize should be set that high, when in 128 i can easily record 10 tracks of audio without a problem, but a tiny MIDI signal needs a ridiculously high buffersize. I can't set it even higher because at the same time (for the live performance) I'm also running puredata and that's quite sensitive about the buffersizes, it doesn't like 1024 at all...
Am I missing something here or does anyone have experience with this.
Domien