Quote:
Originally Posted by brainwreck
Tod the thing that I am noticing most between openness levels is the timbre change, not volume change. But I think it causes a response from me to change hit dynamics. Say I'm playing with a medium hit strength, completely closed, and I begn to open the pedal. The timbre doesn't gradually change. It suddenly changes. That may sound subtle to some people, but it doesn't to me. So then with the sudden timbre change, I begin reactively velocity level hunting with my hit strength to adjust for what my ears think they should be hearing (in vain). And the same goes when going the other way around when playing open samples toward closed samples.
|
Okay, that could be a combination of any number of things. You'd have to know exactly how they were recorded, then know the way in
which they were edited and programmed. The first thing is to record them to capture the dynamics as good as possible, and there are a lot
of considerations when you do that. Then the way you edit them and program them will depend a great deal on how they were recorded.
Quote:
Regardless of any previous statements I have made, I'm realizing that part of all of this is unraveling what is going on technically vs. what I am perceiving, which makes jsfx so handy. It allows for me to isolate things and look closer at what is happening according to how granular I want to look at things. For example, just being able to stay within an openness range and within a specific velocity range and being able to adjust by a single increment of either is very helpful in figuring out what a sampler is actually doing.
|
What exactly is this jsfx analyzing?