View Single Post
Old 10-11-2016, 04:58 PM   #14
Ulf3000
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt View Post
It's not completely useless. For most things, it actually works fine and you'd probably never know the difference as long as your buffers aren't real long. It is limited, though.

Another thing I'd like to see is an actual un-gated, un-rectified, linear audio follower. It works reasonably well ATM for what it's intended - extracting the basic envelope from a "real" audio signal - but if you try to run an LFO in there (instead of using the pm lfo) it gets all distorted and wonky. With this feature alone, many of the options above are almost unnecessary because you could just use the audio engine to mix oscillators and/or use any oscillator plugin you can find and have something very much like a universal CV system.
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Sun View Post
How about a global LFO-generator ?
(like 12 slots)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashcat_lt View Post
How about an LFO on an audio track that you can route wherever you want, mix with others, and basically manipulate like any other signal? Control any and all the parameters you want.

@nightscope - No. PM can really only affect plugin parameters. Luckily, there are plugins for volume and pan that can accomplish about the same thing while leaving the mixer controls free to trim as necessary.


then you can just use a midi-oscillator vst,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XerwDse72U
http://www.cableguys.com/midi-shaper.html
https://www.xferrecords.com/products/lfotool
http://www.codefn42.com/ccstepper/index.html

the point is having a functional toolbox under one hood swissarmeeknife style without having to combine vsts, sends, midichannel, midirouters and midilearns

Last edited by Ulf3000; 10-11-2016 at 05:37 PM.
Ulf3000 is offline   Reply With Quote