View Single Post
Old 11-11-2017, 02:32 PM   #37
lolilol1975
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 1,739
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmtech View Post
33->59 I hear a horrible washed out 96kps mp3. Exactly what i expected to hear.

59 onwards sounds better, much more clarity and presence.
I think I can hear a difference, mainly the first version is more aggressive, probably what your client calls metallic.

Also I noticed from looking at the waveforms that the two takes aren't playing at the same speed. Did you time stretch the audio ? It can introduce artefacts. Try different algorithms and post them here. Also maybe play with some dither and noise shapig during reder.
In any case, I got much better results by adding ReaXcomp and toning down the band 200-1000Hz with a threshold of -14dB and a ratio of 3:1. This removes some nasal frequencies. And the result is much better with the second version than with the first.

Last edited by lolilol1975; 11-11-2017 at 02:47 PM.
lolilol1975 is offline   Reply With Quote