Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilDragon
Doesn't matter, it's not nice to do that via a completely unrelated thread. Anyways, you failed.
|
Didn't say it was nice, but since this bug has been 2 versions back and was posted in the correct place and I received no response from programmers
that is really not nice. All I got was from people saying 192 block size is not a valid bit rate that is really lame.