edit: No I was wrong (but it would make more sense to me like that):
pdc.. examples sammples are wrong:
Code:
pdc_bot_ch=0; pdc_top_ch=2; // delays the first two channels (spl0/spl1).
pdc_bot_ch=2; pdc_top_ch=5; // delays channels spl2,spl3, and spl4.
pdc_top_ch is inclusive, so should be one less:
Code:
pdc_bot_ch=0; pdc_top_ch=1; // delays the first two channels (spl0/spl1).
pdc_bot_ch=2; pdc_top_ch=4; // delays channels spl2,spl3, and spl4.