View Single Post
Old 10-27-2015, 01:15 AM   #8
NakajimaYusuke
Human being with feelings
 
NakajimaYusuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Japan
Posts: 58
Default

Thank you for deciphering my intention.
It seems that I could tell my purpose. I'm happy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pljones View Post
As NINJAM is already delaying the received channels to align to the BPI, if a sender also included each channel's input ASIO delay, each recipient could adjust for that delay when aligning each received channel to the BPI.
I think this is the most clever way!

In my described method, NINJAM Client would produce an extra delay of a bpi.
In the way that you explained, NINJAM Client does not produce even this disadvantage.

Though I'm not conversant with this field,
Perhaps, in synchronization in the current NINJAM server, only the network delay is processed.
When ASIO delay was also added to this synchronization processing, my wish will come true.


The only advantage of my method is "implementation is not a large scale".
It's simply a delay effect that is based on the bpm and bpi and Asio latency.
(Although I have no knowledge to make it...)
__________________
Sorry about my poor English.
NakajimaYusuke is offline   Reply With Quote