Quote:
Originally Posted by dug dog
What would be Melodyne's reason for not implementing, given the seemingly trivial amount of effort required? Are they owned by a company that sees Reaper as a threat?
|
Not that I have a dog in this fight but why would a company that's already created a free plugin extension and API to better access their only product spend time working to conform to another API for one particular daw? It makes no sense.
Then if, for example ARA 2.0 shows up, they're gonna do it again, twice?
It would only maybe make financial sense
(very little still given that there's already an API for it) if Reaper users were buying Melodyne Editor licenses like hotcakes, more than any other workstation users.