Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenakios
Easy graphics isn't going to happen with IPlug or Juce. You will be spending the bulk of your development time dealing with GUI issues. IPlug doesn't have that many ready to use GUI controls. While Juce has more and more customizable GUI controls, you easily end up having issues with graphics performance. Both IPlug and Juce require you to do your GUIs with code, there are no fancy visual GUI designers. (The GUI designer in Juce is obsolete and has been left in the Projucer to support legacy projects.)
Quick compilation and testing is not going to happen when you are using C++.
I recall that RackAfx has been frowned upon because it doesn't allow you to write the most optimized DSP code. That may have been fixed in later versions or there may be some way to bypass the performance limitations.
|
Thank you for that answer. It did make me question how RackAFX would not allow me to write the most optimized code, as I thought in all of the above frameworks I could use my own, that is the exact same DSP C++ code?