View Single Post
Old 08-08-2006, 12:49 AM   #25
chanapar
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 71
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maa
No don't - please! "track inspector" sounds very famliliar but its a rediculous work around for not putting things in the TCP in the first place

What you see in the TCP (Track Controll Pannel) is a matter of
zoom level but leaving things off the GUI and inventing another GUI to compensate is like putting your car on a trailer and getting someone to pull it for you.

We STILL need this:


Cool! You just re-invented the track inspector in the TCP lol! Now if we can just make it dockable/floatable and select the tracks with the arrow keys we're there

So we agree in principle but differ a little in implementation. For a large track count a floating/dockable window makes the most sense but its still good for any number of tracks. If all of us only dealt with a few tracks I'd say putting it all in the TCP is fine, but we don't, so go with the window (inspector, channel strip, whatever lol).

Ara

ps - nice graphic
chanapar is offline   Reply With Quote