You want to cut "tinkle" out of the reverbed hats, but not from the hats themselves and not from any of the other reverbed instruments? And this verb is all 100% wet, like a reverb bus (or aux or whatever) that is parallel to the overall dry mix? Have you decided that you really need the EQ after the verb, rather than before? In my mind it seems like it would be more natural the other way, but it's possible it doesn't matter at all.
Most important question: Is this reverb actual 4 independent channels through, or at least two independent stereo pairs? Otherwise you'll need two of them. The routing should be the same either way.
The easiest way to do this - especially if your reverb is actually only stereo - really would be to send the hat to 3/4 and the rest of the kit to 1/2. Set the EQ to input from and output to 3/4, then the input of the reverb inputs from 1/2 and 3/4. That's of course only if you can live with having the EQ before the verb.
Otherwise what you posted is I think close to the way you'd do it with either a 4-channel verb or two stereo verbs (one on 1/2 and the other on 3/4, parameter linked if you like) except I'm pretty sure you don't want the hats on 1/2 going in. Only send them to 3/4 or they'll get double verbed, and I don't think you want that. You'll also need to sum the stereo pairs back to 1/2 after all the FX, though. I would probably just drop in ReaEQ and set its pins appropriately, but anything at all will work - including the multichannel mixer plugs.
Now, if that verb is not 100% wet, things get even weirder. You'll need another pair of channels carrying the dry mix, leave the actual verb plugs 100% wet, and then you probably will want a channel mixer plug to use for wet/dry balance, though I suppose the output volume of the verb plug(s) would do that.
There aren't too many good reasons to do this all on one track, though. I do it all the time, but I can't explain why.