|
|
|
03-09-2014, 11:44 AM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 7,318
|
Pitch vs. formant
Can anybody explain to me the difference between pitch and formant -as found in ReaPitch?
__________________
Reaper x64, win 11
Composer, text-writer, producer
Bandcamp
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 12:24 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
Posts: 8,062
|
Pitch is the tuning of the sound, formants are peaks in the frequency spectrum that distinguish for example between vocal "a", "e", "o" or if the singer is a female or male, etc.
__________________
I am no longer part of the REAPER community. Please don't contact me with any REAPER-related issues.
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 01:29 PM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Right Hear
Posts: 15,618
|
if you happen to have melodyne, you can tweak the formant on a vocal and clearly hear what it does... just as Xen is saying...
sometimes when changing the pitch of [for example] a vocal note, it just will not sound natural, until there is some formant tweaking.
|
|
|
03-09-2014, 02:12 PM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Sun
Can anybody explain to me the difference between pitch and formant -as found in ReaPitch?
|
When i was trying to figure out the difference I did a Google search with keyword - formant. Several good links come up, which basically elaborate on what has been said here.
But what really did it for me was just playing with all the sliders, taking each to the extreme, one at a time. It becomes pretty clear soon enuf when you just listen.
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 05:36 AM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 7,318
|
Yes, thanks.
I was using ReaPitchs formant to correct a song that was transposed +4 in pitch. Good results.
So, formants are resonants/peaks in the frequency-spectrum?
Then, how can we then tune pitch and formants different?
__________________
Reaper x64, win 11
Composer, text-writer, producer
Bandcamp
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 09:38 AM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,130
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Sun
So, formants are resonants/peaks in the frequency-spectrum? Then, how can we then tune pitch and formants different?
|
I don't know if I understood the principle well, but if you say that formants are responsible for "a,e,i" or female/male voice - then formants are nothing more than harmonics.
In this case the pitch would be the fundamental.
So you could differentiate between fundamental and harmonics.
But the interesting part would be how the harmonics are beeing pitched (if you pitch them all at once you couldn't create a "u" out of an "i" for example...
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 09:56 AM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 'straya
Posts: 9,409
|
Formant is about replicating resonant airspace isn't it? When audio is pitched up without formant there's the chipmunk effect that resembles constricted resonance space, so the low octave fundamentals [harmonics] need reinforcement. I might be totally wrong though.
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 10:54 AM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Sun
Yes, thanks.
I was using ReaPitchs formant to correct a song that was transposed +4 in pitch. Good results.
So, formants are resonants/peaks in the frequency-spectrum?
Then, how can we then tune pitch and formants different?
|
The way I see it, there's lot of theory behind the topic. Formants actually mean more than one thing, as a bit of research reveals. So that's why I also suggest going with what makes sense - adjust the thing till it SOUNDS GOOD. We can read theory until we're blue in the face. Reality is how it sounds. Of course, theory is helpful too. But ReaPitch is not perfect. That's why theory, alone, probably won't give perfect results. And that's why, imo, we have to play around with it until we get something acceptable. At least, that's what I did when working on one aspect of a vocal that warbled a bit too much.
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 01:55 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 7,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by msea
The way I see it, there's lot of theory behind the topic. Formants actually mean more than one thing, as a bit of research reveals. So that's why I also suggest going with what makes sense - adjust the thing till it SOUNDS GOOD. We can read theory until we're blue in the face. Reality is how it sounds. Of course, theory is helpful too. But ReaPitch is not perfect. That's why theory, alone, probably won't give perfect results. And that's why, imo, we have to play around with it until we get something acceptable. At least, that's what I did when working on one aspect of a vocal that warbled a bit too much.
|
Well, this question was about the theory and how a toll like ReaPitch works
__________________
Reaper x64, win 11
Composer, text-writer, producer
Bandcamp
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 7,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timothys_monster
I don't know if I understood the principle well, but if you say that formants are responsible for "a,e,i" or female/male voice - then formants are nothing more than harmonics.
In this case the pitch would be the fundamental.
So you could differentiate between fundamental and harmonics.
But the interesting part would be how the harmonics are beeing pitched (if you pitch them all at once you couldn't create a "u" out of an "i" for example...
|
Yes, I think this is correct.
Pitch alters the fundamental,
and formants alters the harmonics.
For altering pitch of a voice the formants seems to need to be adjusted back -because the resonance-chamber for the voice does not change much for a higher pitched note. (as far as I can understand from googling and reading)
__________________
Reaper x64, win 11
Composer, text-writer, producer
Bandcamp
|
|
|
03-10-2014, 03:02 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Sun
Well, this question was about the theory and how a toll like ReaPitch works
|
Well, as I was saying, the definition of formant arguably depends on who's doing the talking, so to speak.
How can we talk about strict theory if the particulars are variously defined?
Quote:
Phoneticians usually recognize at least two formant regions as uniquely characterizing the different vowels; however, a larger number are present but have less strength. Three formants are generally required to synthesize a vowel sound. These regions appear as dark horizontal bands on a SPECTROGRAM or amplitude peaks on a line SPECTRUM. The CENTRE FREQUENCY of a formant region is called the formant frequency, as listed in the table below. Sung vowels are characterized by an additional formant called the singing formant in the range of 2500 to 3000 Hz. It is created by the special resonance of the vocal tract when the larynx is lowered, as practised by trained singers in the Western tradition. The formant not only gives sung vowels a characteristic colour, but also allows the voice to be heard over the accompaniment of instruments or even a full orchestra.
|
http://www.sfu.ca/sonic-studio/handbook/Formant.html
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 PM.
|