 |
|
|
11-17-2018, 09:23 AM
|
#1
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 476
|
Delay compensation (PDC)
Hi. Is this normal, when delay compensation of a plug-in (say, EQ or compressor) is 0 spls?
The analyzer seems a second late. Or even more...
How can a REAPER user adjust PDC?
|
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 12:38 PM
|
#2
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Krefeld, Germany
Posts: 14,785
|
PDC is not about synchronizing sound and GUI, but about synchronizing between the tracks.
Supposedly you set a great latency in you sound equipment driver - which might or might not be appropriate.
-Michael
|
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 02:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: France
Posts: 628
|
Did you check your Anticipative Fx processing setting too ? You can lower that one to get things more responsive...
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 02:52 PM
|
#4
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mschnell
PDC is not about synchronizing sound and GUI, but about synchronizing between the tracks.
Supposedly you set a great latency in you sound equipment driver - which might or might not be appropriate.
-Michael
|
No, not at all, the usual 128 spls.
A dozen audio tracks...
So, it's not PDC we're talking about, it's... PADC —
plugin analyzer delay compensation )
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 03:01 PM
|
#5
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regisfofo
Did you check your Anticipative Fx processing setting too ? You can lower that one to get things more responsive...
|
I've changed 1200 to 200. And it's got better.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
11-17-2018, 11:51 PM
|
#6
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Krefeld, Germany
Posts: 14,785
|
Which "it", and where ?
-Michael
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 12:30 AM
|
#7
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mschnell
Which "it", and where ?
-Michael
|
The synchronization between the sound and its appearance (is this the right word?) on an analyzer.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 02:24 AM
|
#8
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Krefeld, Germany
Posts: 14,785
|
Sorry for being vague  What did you change " 1200 to 200" ?
-Michael
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 02:33 AM
|
#9
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 1,368
|
I assume s/he meant:
Options > Preferences > Audio > Buffering >
Anticipative FX Processing - superior multiprocessing and lower interface latencies (may not be compatible with certain FX (UAD), live monitoring is not processed)
Render ahead [200]ms (default 200)
Why it would be on 1200 is moot.
__________________
Windows 10 Pro. Intel i7 3400ghz. 16GB Ram. Focusrite Scarlett 8i6. Reaper 64.
|
|
|
|
|
11-18-2018, 03:52 AM
|
#10
|
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mschnell
Sorry for being vague What did you change " 1200 to 200" ?
-Michael |
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertP
I assume s/he meant:
Options > Preferences > Audio > Buffering >
Anticipative FX Processing - superior multiprocessing and lower interface latencies (may not be compatible with certain FX (UAD), live monitoring is not processed)
Render ahead [200]ms (default 200)
Why it would be on 1200 is moot.
|
Robert answered correctly.
I thought it would be obvious from the context (I quoted Regisfofo there).
Why this setting was on 1200? Frankly, I don't recall.
And it's a "he" )
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:05 AM.
|
