Old 05-08-2021, 02:53 AM   #1
giulioh
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Italy
Posts: 3
Default JSFX PulEQ-emu

Hi everyone
I realized my first effect: a simulation of the historian PULTEC EQP-1

Features:

-Preamp simulation
-Low frequenzy selector, bust and attenuation
-Hig frequenzy selector, bandwidth, bust and attenuation



Download https://stash.reaper.fm/41964/PulEQ-emu_Giulio%20II

Did you like it? Subscribe at my PATREON!

Last edited by giulioh; 05-15-2021 at 01:51 AM.
giulioh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 03:25 AM   #2
dug dog
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,802
Default

Welcome to the forum Giulioh:

Very nice that your first post is a gift to the community.
dug dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2021, 12:28 PM   #3
SaulT
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 876
Default

Put a Colored Noise Generator first, set it to white noise, put your plugin next, then SPAN with a flat slope. Low Boost and Low Attenuation cancel each other out. There is no shelf effect, no "dip".

There is a thread from a while back where a few of us gave it a shot.

https://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=126728


A simple shelf is obtained by adding a lowpassed signal to the dry signal. In other words,

Shelf(x) = x + LP(x)

A simple way to get the Pultech effect on the low end is to

Pultec(x) = x + LP(x) - LP2(x)

Where LP2 is an identical lowpass but at a higher frequency. I used one octave up. You can vary the intensity of the shelf and dip by using a simple blend knob, ie

Pultech(x) = dry*x + wet*( LP(x) - LP2(x) )

...

Obviously you should do your own experimentation to come up with your version of it, but I can tell you that you can get a pretty healthy effect out of just using single order filters, bumping up to biquads can make a very exaggerated effect, one I decided that I didn't like.

If I was to try again I would use a different saturation function, add oversampling, maybe a DC block, and tweak the knob values for sure. Also I only modeled the effect on the low end, I didn't take it any further than that.
SaulT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2021, 10:35 PM   #4
rafa1981
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 189
Default

https://www.bertomaudio.com/eqca.html
rafa1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2021, 03:10 AM   #5
rafa1981
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 189
Default

Two things, if you are going to distort the first filter the second will act as antialias filter too, so maybe no oversampling needed, considering that this is a filter that tops at the low frequencies.

Then the big DSP boys say that for audio DSP there is very seldom a reason to use biquads, e.g. Andrew Simper's TPT SVF filter is equally cheap and takes modulation like a champ.
rafa1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2021, 06:24 AM   #6
giulioh
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Italy
Posts: 3
Default

thanks rafa1981 for your advice, I'm new to programming and I'll try to use what you told me
__________________
MY PATREON - ALL MY PLUGIN
giulioh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.