Go Back   Cockos Incorporated Forums > REAPER Forums > REAPER for Ambisonic and 3D positional audio uses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2018, 05:57 PM   #41
junh1024
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers View Post

Side note.. Any advice on on decoding ambisonics without buying the official dolby decoder. Looking for a digital solution to go with my speakers.

The height speakers will also be nice for ambisonics too!
Not sure dolby has ambi decoders.

ATK has decoders. Also https://www.york.ac.uk/sadie-project/ambidec.html to be used with http://www.matthiaskronlachner.com/?p=2015
junh1024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 12:54 AM   #42
jm duchenne
Human being with feelings
 
jm duchenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: France
Posts: 721
Default

Considering the microphones, you could take a look at the Zylia :
http://www.zylia.co/

I have one, together with an Ambeo and a Brahma (I had a Tetramic too but it was too noisy), and the 3rd order decoding makes a real improvement, even if the mic quality itself is behind the Ambeo (but the price too !).

Being able to do the recording with a lightweight tablet is also a nice alternative to an expensive recorder...
jm duchenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 03:30 AM   #43
ReaDave
Human being with feelings
 
ReaDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers View Post
Just to say. I've got a guy in the UK who is making his first 2nd order mic (but he makes other custom mics for sale too so he knows his stuff!)

He should be done with calibration and decoding software etc on it in the next few weeks.

I'll let you guys know how it went (when I have it in my hands) and if he's up for making more then I'll pass on his details I can't say price yet as this was a bit cheaper than he might sell them for normally but will say that the zoom f8 and the mic was definitely worth getting over say the sennheiser mic!

Got a zoom f8 to go with it as the sound devices only had 4 ins and the zoom can Gang all 8 ins. It's also as quiet as the sound devices we have so win win!

Will do a review once I have it.

Side note.. Any advice on on decoding ambisonics without buying the official dolby decoder. Looking for a digital solution to go with my speakers.

The height speakers will also be nice for ambisonics too!
I'm definitely interested in keeping up with the progress of this mic.

Regarding Ambi decoding, along with the ATK decoders, there's also the free ones in the Blue Ripple Core suite (although they are horizontal only and don't decode height).
Google the Bruce Wiggins decoders too. He has a variety of different decoders for free which are quite good.
ReaDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 03:34 AM   #44
ReaDave
Human being with feelings
 
ReaDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jm duchenne View Post
Considering the microphones, you could take a look at the Zylia :
http://www.zylia.co/

I have one, together with an Ambeo and a Brahma (I had a Tetramic too but it was too noisy), and the 3rd order decoding makes a real improvement, even if the mic quality itself is behind the Ambeo (but the price too !).

Being able to do the recording with a lightweight tablet is also a nice alternative to an expensive recorder...
I've been keeping up with the progress of this since their early crowd funding days. I've been in touch with their team too.
The thing holding me back is the necessity of a computer of some sort for recording. A fair part of my Ambi recording is location work and I'm after something that will work with my 744T recorder.

Your experience with the noise of the Tetramic is one of the things that held me back from purchasing one.
ReaDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 06:35 AM   #45
musicbynumbers
Human being with feelings
 
musicbynumbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: brighton, uk
Posts: 12,589
Default

Sorry guys, I meant to say "atmos" decoding rather than Ambiesonics. Got Ambisonics stuff sorted (thanks to this thread!) but the dolby atmos stuff is a pain for sure.

Will probably leave atmos decoding till a company needs it and then I'll buy the proper decoder (sigh, hate giving money to dolby!)

ReaDave.. Will let you know how the mic goes.
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
musicbynumbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 09:25 AM   #46
ReaDave
Human being with feelings
 
ReaDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia (originally from Geelong)
Posts: 5,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers View Post
Sorry guys, I meant to say "atmos" decoding rather than Ambiesonics. Got Ambisonics stuff sorted (thanks to this thread!) but the dolby atmos stuff is a pain for sure.

Will probably leave atmos decoding till a company needs it and then I'll buy the proper decoder (sigh, hate giving money to dolby!)

ReaDave.. Will let you know how the mic goes.
Thanks regarding the mic.

Regarding Atmos, the Blue Ripple Decoder suite contains a decoder for creating Atmos beds from third order Ambisonics but I don't know of any decoders for full Atmos aside from what Dolby themselves offer.

Edit - the Blue Ripple Upmixer suite also contains Atmos bed upmixers to insert Atmos beds into Ambisonic mixes. I have both of these suite and, while not cheap, they are by far the best Ambisonic tools I have.

More details here.... http://www.blueripplesound.com/story/new-712-support

Last edited by ReaDave; 03-08-2018 at 09:33 AM.
ReaDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2018, 04:06 PM   #47
junh1024
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 115
Default

@m consumer & @m pro are 2 separate codecs (inb4 it's not a codec)

If you don't mind only 7.1 for @tmos c, eac3to can do that for free. For full 3D decoding, mightaswell but a 3D AVR & record that. There may be some dev-only or non-public tools for disassembly of @c streams.

@m pro: Not sure if any Dolby suites have pro decoders, but it's not meant to be disassembled/decoded. Not sure if it has bitstream tools (DTS:X ES does). Again, you can buy pro theatre decoders but those are very expensive.
junh1024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2018, 03:33 AM   #48
musicbynumbers
Human being with feelings
 
musicbynumbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: brighton, uk
Posts: 12,589
Default

Thanks guys for the info!

I think it's the "object" part of atmos that is the pain in the ass.

I've got it on good authority that quite a lot of mixers still treat atmos as just 7.1 with the overheads (so just as an atmos "bed") and don't bother with objects.

That suites me just fine
__________________
subproject FRs click here
note: don't search for my pseudonym on the web. The "musicbynumbers" you find is not me or the name I use for my own music.
musicbynumbers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2018, 06:06 AM   #49
cyrano
Human being with feelings
 
cyrano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,764
Default

There are ambi mics popping up allover the place. The absolute low budget winner is the Twirling 720 Microphone, around 160$. It has a peculiar stereo looking output. 2 channels @96 kHz, but the 4 channel info @ 48 kHz is present, interleaved, so it needs it's own software decoder.

http://yun.twirlingvr.com/index.php/...e/lite-en.html

There's also the Oktava MK4012 classic first order 4 channel mic. 799 €. Limited edition.

http://www.oktava-shop.com/Small-and...012-01-12.html

And no, I don't own one

Yet.

Thinking of building a simple electret one. If I can find the time
__________________
“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity” Albert Einstein
cyrano is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2018, 03:04 PM   #50
junh1024
Human being with feelings
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicbynumbers View Post
Thanks guys for the info!

I think it's the "object" part of atmos that is the pain in the ass.
Only if u don;t have an @m obj panner (aka Nuendo/PT)

)[/QUOTE]
Quote:

I've got it on good authority that quite a lot of mixers still treat atmos as just 7.1 with the overheads (so just as an atmos "bed") and don't bother with objects.

That suites me just fine
There's 2 types of @M tracks: base & obj. BTW, speakers are objs too (they consume 10o of the 128o limit)
junh1024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.