|
06-13-2005, 01:16 PM
|
#1
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,353
|
PathSync feature request thread
Everybody who wants something added to PathSync, request it here. Or discuss what other people have suggested if you think something is or isn't worth doing....
|
|
|
04-04-2006, 11:47 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
|
fuzzy time option
Great, intelligent software. But I have a feature request. Here's the problem first:
After syncing local files to my usb thumb drive, if I click "analyze" a second time, I get a second list of files, even though I just synced. The reason is because a number of files on the thumb drive say they were last revised 2 seconds after the original local file, and therefore are newer, and so pathsync wants, understandably, to update the local files. I am using windows 2000 traditional chinese, sp4. It happens with .doc, .zip, .tif files. But it doesn't happen with every file.
Is there some way to change this behavior in windows, or if not, I would greatly appreciate a checkbox that would ignore a 2 second time difference if the filesize is the same?
Thanks!
|
|
|
04-05-2006, 01:13 AM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hertford, England
Posts: 23
|
When doing a one-way synch (i.e. local --> remote for all files), I would like the ability to ask Pathsync to remove old directories from the remote side that have already been deleted from the local side. This would mean that I wouldn't have to regularly run a script on the remote machine to tidy up the directory list!
Otherwise for what I use it for (remote backups!) it's fantastic - thanks (o:
Chris
|
|
|
04-14-2006, 08:04 AM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5
|
"When doing a one-way synch (i.e. local --> remote for all files), I would like the ability to ask Pathsync to remove old directories from the remote side that have already been deleted from the local side."
I second that...this should be the behaviour anyway, imho.
|
|
|
04-24-2006, 04:36 PM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
|
Sync directories???
I would like to request the ability to synchronize directories...
I know that the name is "PathSync" but it does not quite do that.
If you have any empty directories in local, and do a transfer from local to remote, the empty directories will *NOT* be copied.
If you have removed a directory in local, and do a transfer from local to remote, the directory will NOT be removed. Any files IN the directory will be removed, however.
Otherwise, AWESOME PROGRAM! Thanks!
|
|
|
05-06-2006, 03:50 AM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hertford, England
Posts: 23
|
Another problem I occasionally get is when trying to copy files that are in use, pathsync just says that the file cannot be opened, and doesn't copy it. Better behaviour would be just a warning that the file is open, but to copy the version that is saved on the disc anyway.
|
|
|
08-13-2007, 02:23 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
|
Feature added
Quote:
Originally Posted by harrkev
If you have removed a directory in local, and do a transfer from local to remote, the directory will NOT be removed. Any files IN the directory will be removed, however.
|
I needed this feature too, so I added it and it's in the latest version, 0.34.
Empty directories are both created and deleted as needed.
Last edited by goatpunch; 08-14-2007 at 09:45 PM.
Reason: Updated to mention v0.34
|
|
|
08-13-2007, 02:20 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
|
Possible solution
Quote:
Originally Posted by User721386
Is there some way to change this behavior in windows, or if not, I would greatly appreciate a checkbox that would ignore a 2 second time difference if the filesize is the same?
|
Sounds like the NTFS/FAT problem that was fixed by Jens Puhlman, and rolled into the 'unofficial' versions 0.33b and 0.33c that can be found on this message board.
|
|
|
06-11-2012, 11:57 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,433
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Brian Merrill
wish I could queue up syncs and save sets, etc...
|
I just discovered PathSync yesterday. What a great little program!
Thing in quotes is the only thing I feel is missing.
|
|
|
06-27-2012, 04:06 AM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mediterrenean Sea
Posts: 977
|
Where is the help documentation?
Can somebody point me how to use pathsync in the command line?
|
|
|
08-09-2012, 06:18 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 4
|
Command line
Quote:
Originally Posted by antiClick
Where is the help documentation?
Can somebody point me how to use pathsync in the command line?
|
Run:
pathsync --help
It's a bit fiddly to put everything into a .pss first, but I'm writing a wrapper in NSIS that also allows a somewhat primitive context menu item that lets you choose dir1 then dir2 in Windows Explorer and then opens Pathsync with both set. I should put a few of these little utilities up for others to use - will work on doing that.
Cheers,
Adam
|
|
|
05-05-2007, 06:18 PM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
|
Zip capability
Hey guys:
This is a very nice and useful software but can a zip capability be added on future releases like for example Backzip.
Thanks.
|
|
|
10-17-2007, 04:21 AM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
|
Long time archiving
Great program, I use it each day because it is small, reliable, open source and it runs from batch files, well done.
My request is to add a sync option to solve following problem. I do not want to loose files which are deleted from source, these files must be safed in case of the deleting was made by mistake or done by a virus. OK I can enable "do not delete missing files at remote" but this would blow up the backup archive. I would prefer to designate a third folder (source, remote, BACKUP) where Pathsync safes files which are deleted from the source folder and get deleted from the target when syncronized.
Would it be complicated to realize? I suppose this feature is helpful for many people.
|
|
|
10-20-2010, 03:20 PM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Mediterrenean Sea
Posts: 977
|
Shutdown windows after sync is completed
I use pathsync to mirror my entire data disc into an external backup disk after every session. To force a windows shutdown after the process is completed would save me a lot of time.
Thank you Justin
|
|
|
11-27-2010, 03:35 PM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 7,181
|
here's a thing I'd want right now... touch
So I have a bunch of files of which I know that they are the same on the remote as on the local. Due to the NTFS/FAT DST bug/feature ( http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/libr...90(VS.85).aspx) PathSync thinks the files on one device is newer/older and wants to copy. It would be great if I could tell it just to touch and thus adjusting the time and not copy the files.
And this touch would change the time stamps on the files of one device to the same as on the other. Thus, I could get files I know are identical to have the same time stamp
__________________
// MVHMF
I never always did the right thing, but all I did wasn't wrong...
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 11:36 AM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 115
|
great software, problem is it crashes when trying to scan/move large amounts of data (200+ gb), it crashed during analysis...
anyone else have this problem?
|
|
|
01-20-2011, 12:16 PM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 4,630
|
I'm using the stable (35) version almost every day on PC and would not hesitate to use this in OSX if it were available. I'm currently using Deja Vu.
|
|
|
05-29-2011, 01:20 PM
|
#18
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 104
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by phrenik
great software, problem is it crashes when trying to scan/move large amounts of data (200+ gb), it crashed during analysis...
anyone else have this problem?
|
This happens to me, but with larger amounts. Only really started when trying to update my second backup drive from my first one (both have about 700GB of data on them). Not sure if this is something that can be dealt with...
Also: It would be nice if changing the deafult synchronization action didn't require a reanalysis. Couldn't it just run through the list and change it's planned actions, rather than rescanning everything?
Hoping you guys will update Pathsync sometime in the near future, maybe when Reaper 4 is finally ready for release.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 AM.
|