Quote:
Originally Posted by ferropop
Probably useful that everyone's airing their desired workflows, and it might require nothing more than all the necessary basic actions being added, and all the more complicated nuances of comping build on top of those actions.
|
My feeling on this, and this is just me shooting off at the mouth, is that describing workflows is less productive (and my observation is that it's taken less seriously) compared to expressing problems to be solved.
Like, "I need to be able to quickly audition non-playmarked lanes", or "I need to be able to edit the raw comp without modifying the source material". As opposed to "how Sexan/Pro Tools/Logic does it".