For remote working to reduce latency streaming with ReaCast towards Icecast or Shoutcast (it works on both), a lower latency than 5-8 seconds will be great.
Opus seems to be able to get this.
It will be great to get it into ReaCast.
Thank you so much
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
rapid question ('cause I don't know it yet): is it enabling a client to connect directly reaper using just a browser?
Because with the auxilium of Icecast, Reaper (with reaCast) can give this and it's even with login and password :-)
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
When you load it it opens the browser. When the other one loads it, it opens their browser.
The shown page shows the Studiolink-ID.
You just call the other one and that's it.
As I said, conceptually like Skype. So the Studiolink-ID is like the "login".
Only those who you call, or whose call-in you accept will be able to talk and listen.
When you load it it opens the browser. When the other one loads it, it opens their browser.
The shown page shows the Studiolink-ID.
You just call the other one and that's it.
As I said, conceptually like Skype. So the Studiolink-ID is like the "login".
Only those who you call, or whose call-in you accept will be able to talk and listen.
I've found time to test it. It seems great. I tested on loopback.
But the client, shouldn't have it. My goal is to make the client able to connect and to listen to via normal browser. Sending to her the mix or the master working in smart working, in practice ...
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
IIRC, Sebastian is currently developing it in a way, that it works in the browser completely, though I have no idea, whether that worked or didn't.
Edit: It's called QuickWeb and a feature only available for the paid options. With that, you get a link, that you can send to your client and they open it in their browsers. No additional software needed.
Though I never tested it(and the studiolink-website has no english translation, so if this is an option for you, just write him a mail for further questions.
You can find his mail-address over here:
IIRC, Sebastian is currently developing it in a way, that it works in the browser completely, though I have no idea, whether that worked or didn't.
Edit: It's called QuickWeb and a feature only available for the paid options. With that, you get a link, that you can send to your client and they open it in their browsers. No additional software needed.
Though I never tested it(and the studiolink-website has no english translation, so if this is an option for you, just write him a mail for further questions.
You can find his mail-address over here:
IIRC, Sebastian is currently developing it in a way, that it works in the browser completely, though I have no idea, whether that worked or didn't.
Edit: It's called QuickWeb and a feature only available for the paid options. With that, you get a link, that you can send to your client and they open it in their browsers. No additional software needed.
Though I never tested it(and the studiolink-website has no english translation, so if this is an option for you, just write him a mail for further questions.
You can find his mail-address over here:
He's also very active and does great support for StudioLink.
I did write the same day you suggested it to me.
Till today: no answer.
However I see that QuickWeb (that's supposed to do what I'm asking) is into the Freemium, and hopefully he will release it soon and inside Freemium as well (perhaps limited to just one client per time).
Let's wait and see, hoping that the waiting time will be shorter than my life span :-p :-p :-p
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
For remote working to reduce latency streaming with ReaCast towards Icecast or Shoutcast (it works on both), a lower latency than 5-8 seconds will be great.
Opus seems to be able to get this.
It will be great to get it into ReaCast.
Do you mean 5-8 m Seconds ?
What exactly are you trying to accomplish. (Or am I just completely off-track here).
If this is "jamming" with other musicians via the Internet, I suppose the most critical latency is the Internet. Here a peer-to-peer protocol needs to be established (like with KamKazam).
@Mschnell
Studiolink has a freemium model with payment plans for additional features. So using it for some basic stuff is actually free.
You don't get your own custom user-id for calling for instance, only a generated one. The payment plans from 1€/month and higher include that.
And a livestream to send to multiple users, etc.
Though cause of the pandemic, Sebastian has made some of the stuff available for the free users as well.
@BartR
I think he's currently quite busy, as Germany got back into hard lockdown. Haven't checked, but if QuickWeb is part of the free plan currently, it's probably because of that.
Nevertheless, if you think, it does what you want, getting a paid plan supports Sebastian to keep it up.
He made the whole Studiolink infrastructure free for use for several years, paying for this out of his own pocket(the whole german podcasting scene benefits from it) and ppl had to beg him to be able to support him financially.
Studio Link seems to use peer-to-peer for the Audio stream. So this seems promising !
-Michael
Right to the point:
Studio sends mixes and masters to the client to listen to them, with very small latency. So that in case the client "hey can I get the guitar slightly boosted?" the result is immediate and not after 5-8 seconds.
Moreover, the point is to avoid that clients are constrained to install something and/or learn to use it. Just they receive a link, click on it, and get the audi (protected by an addressed token, so that she an't hear mixes belonging to other ones).
That's it :-)
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
Just tested the Studiolink and seems to work very well.
I normally use audiomovers in PCM 24 bits for final mixes to the clients. Since this uses some compression i need to test more to see if its reliable for clients to make some audio judgments on the fly.
Thanks for sharing.
Just tested the Studiolink and seems to work very well.
I normally use audiomovers in PCM 24 bits for final mixes to the clients. Since this uses some compression i need to test more to see if its reliable for clients to make some audio judgments on the fly.
Thanks for sharing.
Yes Studio link works very well. But as I said it will be great if in the future, the client should NOT download anything, just having a link e connecting directly the DAW via just a browser ...
About the relationship with clients: NO I don't use and I no want to use Audiomovers at all.
I do use Icecast as here
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository
I just downloaded and started StudioLink the first time, and I intended to connect it to Reaper via ReaRoute. But the only audio interface StudioLink offers in the dropdown box is WASAPI, no ASIO.
OK.
It was easy to convert my "JamKazam" project to using the StudioLink VST instead.
(Supposedly in the end I would need to install a second StudioLink Chanel - hopefully with lower "priority" - for the JamKazam voice channel. )
The Music from StudioLink server comes in perfectly.
But when I do a call to "echo", the return is very soft and rather distorted.
Moreover I get a latency that is by far higher than the latency I get with a "solo" ("quick start private") session in JamKazam.
There's a file in the user folder(Appdata/studiolink-folder or something?) in which you can edit some stuff, but I don't know how exactly and how the changes affect Studiolink's performance, as I never looked into it yet.
Just look for files called studiolink in the user-folder and you probably find it.
There's a file in the user folder(Appdata/studiolink-folder or something?) in which you can edit some stuff, but I don't know how exactly and how the changes affect Studiolink's performance, as I never looked into it yet.
Just look for files called studiolink in the user-folder and you probably find it.
Just out of curiosity, I checked on Appdata and there is not any folder (on my PC) named "Studio-Link".
__________________
Reaper: always the most up-to-date.
O.S.: Windows 11 Pro
ReaPack (with bilingual Tutorials): https://bit.ly/ReaPack_Repository