|
03-11-2009, 05:12 PM
|
#1
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,528
|
Ordinal numbers in American schools?
I recall reading that American schools now approve "fault" ordinal numbers, like 1th, 2th, 3th, ... (instead of 1st, 2nd, 3rd).
I've googled my ass sore but can't find anything related to the news. What I did find was a few dates, like "May 1th", "2th dec" and "March 3th".
So what's up, is my memory from a nightmare or not?
__________________
______ Announcing__mrelwood plugins______
.. MacBook Pro 16" Late '19 .. Scarlett 6i6, Saffire Pro 24 DSP (+ADA8000) .. FCA610 .. EVE SC207 .. Focal: Shape 65, Alpha 65, CMS 40, Listen Pro ..
|
|
|
03-11-2009, 06:48 PM
|
#2
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 208
|
I've not heard of such a thing. No one here uses those. I can't imagine why schools would teach it
__________________
Primary
Reaper v3.12
Intel Quad Q6600 2.4ghz / Intel D975XBX2KR Mobo
4gb Geil RAM / WD Caviar SE16 7200rmp SATA2 drives / Antec 650w Trio PS
RMA Hammerfall 9632 w/ 4input daughter board
Reamote Slave
Reaper v3.12
Intel P4 2.6gh / 2gb RAM / WD Caviar SE16 7200rmp SATA2 drives
Apps
Antares v5 / Kompact v1.04 / Melodyne
Kjaerhus GCO-1Compressor
Kjaerhus Classic Plugs / SIR1
Last edited by TheArchitect; 03-12-2009 at 01:53 PM.
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 05:35 AM
|
#3
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,298
|
I work for a public school district in the US. I don't believe this new format (Nth) is being used anywhere in the city I live.
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 11:17 AM
|
#4
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,070
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheArchitect
I've not heard of such a thing. No one hear uses those. I can't imagine why schools would teach it
|
But we have replaced the word here with "hear"! LOL
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 12:07 PM
|
#5
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngarjuna
I work for a public school district in the US.
|
So do American Schools approve to "this new format (Nth)", or no?
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 12:13 PM
|
#6
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,298
|
I don't believe so. I think 1st, 2nd, 3rd, Nth is still considered correct.
Since I'm not an educator (not at this job, anyway), I did shoot an email to the superintendent of curriculum to find out for sure. Also, she's involved in a lot of "trendsetting" organizations, so I also asked whether she had ever heard of this new notation and whether or not it seems to be gaining ground (we're in the middle of the mid-west, not exactly the bleeding edge).
I'll let you know when I get some answers.
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 12:55 PM
|
#7
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
I really doubt anyone would be brainless enough to try teaching ordinal numbers that way. Even if they did, unless they're also going to teach kids to pronounce them "Firth", "Seconth", and "Thirth", it would never last.
Then again, this IS the country that still thinks water freezing at 32 degrees and 5280 feet to a mile are an efficient system, so you never know.
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 01:04 PM
|
#8
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,298
|
I can see the logic of it, personally. The biggest complaint that I hear about English is how exceptional and non-standardized it is. Reducing the number of "little special cases" would help greatly in making international English a little less painful for non-speakers.
But yeah, don't count on Americans to make sense when it comes to measuring things. Even the British have given up on Imperial Units (how do you like that for irony).
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 01:22 PM
|
#9
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,070
|
Logic? Really? I'll 2th that.
Don't wanna be a 3th wheel either.
At the ballgame....It's the top of the 3th inning....runners on 1th and 2th.....the batter hits a single down the 3th base line....
LOL
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 01:35 PM
|
#10
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Silicon Gulch
Posts: 544
|
Quote:
At the ballgame....It's the top of the 3th inning....runners on 1th and 2th.....the batter hits a single down the 3th base line....
|
Could you please quit lisping?! (or were you talking Castillian?)
__________________
Inundated by a Perfect Storm of Gluten-Free Artisanal Bespoke Quinoa Avocado-Toast Toilet Paper.
Mahope Kakou (Later Dudes)...
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 01:35 PM
|
#11
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 82
|
Firth Of Fifth?
|
|
|
03-12-2009, 01:49 PM
|
#12
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad
Logic? Really? I'll 2th that.
Don't wanna be a 3th wheel either.
At the ballgame....It's the top of the 3th inning....runners on 1th and 2th.....the batter hits a single down the 3th base line....
LOL
|
So who's on firth, what's on seconth, I don't know's on thirth?
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 10:20 AM
|
#13
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,298
|
Superintendent has never heard of this new method, so not only are we not using it, there is no immediate plan to adopt.
I would say it is not widespread if it's in use in the US at all.
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 02:35 PM
|
#14
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad
Logic? Really? I'll 2th that.
Don't wanna be a 3th wheel either.
At the ballgame....It's the top of the 3th inning....runners on 1th and 2th.....the batter hits a single down the 3th base line....
LOL
|
Well it would be logical in that you would still pronounce it as first, second, third, fourth ...
So -th would be the ordinal indicator. And not -st, -nd, -rd, -th depending on what ordinal number it is.
Here in Germany ordinal indicator is simple dot behind the number (for everything). So 1. = 1st. While 1 = 1.
French its -er or -e (in some instances if I'm right).
Some countries use the degree symbol (the little o) or a in superscribe. Some have weird indicators and some even have indicators that are different depending on the GENDER of the number, etc...
So while it seems illogical to have a common -th for everything, it indeed is logical (if you look at the -th as an ordinal indicator only rather than an ordinal indicator derived from the real pronounced word for that specific ordinal).
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 06:31 PM
|
#15
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 5,563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad
Logic? Really? I'll 2th that.
Don't wanna be a 3th wheel either.
At the ballgame....It's the top of the 3th inning....runners on 1th and 2th.....the batter hits a single down the 3th base line....
LOL
|
But this way your able too wright 2thbrush or so.
Was dizz rong?
-Dayta
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 06:37 PM
|
#16
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 5,563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbarkhouse
Firth Of Fifth?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lokasenna
So who's on firth, what's on seconth, I don't know's on thirth?
|
It gets even harder when it comes to thixth - ööhm or sithxth or whatever.
-Thatha
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 06:51 PM
|
#17
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 6,551
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOSER
So while it seems illogical to have a common -th for everything, it indeed is logical (if you look at the -th as an ordinal indicator only rather than an ordinal indicator derived from the real pronounced word for that specific ordinal).
|
I would argue that deriving the indicator from the pronounced word is quite logical, and anyone who would stumble on it simply isn't familiar with the language in the first place. If you know first, second, third, fourth, I fail to see where the jump to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th could be difficult.
English has tons of exceptions, yes, and I've read that it's one of the more difficult languages to learn for that reason. The way we write ordinals, though, doesn't seem like an exception to me - it's just an abbreviation.
Incidentally, French isn't all that different. First - Premier - 1er, Second - Deuxieme - 2e, Third - Troisieme - 3e, etc. The ordinals are derived from the original word, and the only difference is that English has three exceptions to the standard ending as opposed to one.
Last edited by Lokasenna; 03-16-2009 at 07:04 PM.
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 07:18 PM
|
#18
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lokasenna
I would argue that deriving the indicator from the pronounced word is quite logical, and anyone who would stumble on it simply isn't familiar with the language in the first place. If you know first, second, third, fourth, I fail to see where the jump to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th could be difficult.
English has tons of exceptions, yes, and I've read that it's one of the more difficult languages to learn for that reason. The way we write ordinals, though, doesn't seem like an exception to me - it's just an abbreviation.
Incidentally, French isn't all that different. First - Premier - 1er, Second - Deuxieme - 2e, Third - Troisieme - 3e, etc. The ordinals are derived from the original word, and the only difference is that English has three exceptions to the standard ending as opposed to one.
|
Well I never argued that 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc ... is illogical. I only pointed out that having -th for everything is not illogical when you don't consider the origin of the -th, like Brad seemed to imply it.
|
|
|
03-16-2009, 09:56 PM
|
#19
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 5,563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lokasenna
I would argue that deriving the indicator from the pronounced word is quite logical, and anyone who would stumble on it simply isn't familiar with the language in the first place. If you know first, second, third, fourth, I fail to see where the jump to 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th could be difficult.
English has tons of exceptions, yes, and I've read that it's one of the more difficult languages to learn for that reason. The way we write ordinals, though, doesn't seem like an exception to me - it's just an abbreviation.
|
I (being German too) can follow Losers args there and I'd even go further and say it's kinda illogical. You say "one" for 1 and not "fir", so logically it would be "oneth", you say "two" for 2 and not "seco" and logically this would be "twoth" and you say "three" for 3 and not "thi" and logically it would be "threeth". I can't see where there the abbreviation is, because f.i. "second" is even longer than "twoth". It just comes in when you write numbers instead of words, i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd instead of first, second and third. But this is a cultural grown thing, that hasn't to be logical. In fact, these are the things that keep languages alive in terms of evolving, And so, we, the foreign language speaking people get around with that I think - but logical? No.
I'd say this 1th, 2th 3th thing is part of laziness and indifference against the own language and also because many texts are created automatically nowadays where for numbers wildcards are used. So when the numbers are filled in, there's always a "th" behind them, no matter, whether there's a 1, 2, 3, 5, 21 or whatever in front of it. Well, software could be that intelligent and fill the right "st", "nd" or "rd" in, but it rarely is. And the more these things are seen, the more people get used to them and often they even don't know it's wrong. It goes into the same direction, where people confuse "their" and "there" or "its" and "it's" or "your" and "you're" in writing.
In Germany we have this "declining of culture" as well.
-Data
Last edited by Mr. Data; 03-16-2009 at 10:12 PM.
|
|
|
03-17-2009, 05:47 AM
|
#20
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,298
|
That's kind of how I see it too, this is an attempt to make an "easy version" of the rule which doesn't correspond to the words as they're actually spoken. From the perspective of people who don't primarily speak English, this seems sensible to me. Yes, we could program stuff to recognize the grammar rules for 1-3 but why bother. Other than the fact that it reflects the phonetics of the pronounced word, it doesn't really add anything beyond that, so it's perfectly acceptable to standardize Nth for various uses.
From the perspective of people who do primarily speak English, particularly people learning to speak/read/write (US schools), it would seem a better choice to reinforce the student's knowledge of the exceptions that they will be expected to know and use (first, second, third) and use the non-standard 1st, 2nd, 3rd. Because unlike writing 2th (which will be obvious and understood by most of the people reading it), asking "Who will go twoeth?" will get you a lot of funny looks.
|
|
|
03-17-2009, 07:50 AM
|
#21
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Location
Posts: 5,563
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngarjuna
From the perspective of people who don't primarily speak English, this seems sensible to me.
|
Yes, another thing I stumbled upon when learning English was "go" and "went", 'cos these words don't have really much in common writing- and speaking-wise.
But back to numbers: In Germany we have these illogicalities too. You say for instance twenty-three and in German it is "dreiundzwanzig", which would be three-and-twenty, which in fact doesn't really make sense, because we read from left to right. So why do we say "drei" first? It gets even worse with larger numbers as f.e. 123, which is "einhundertdreiundzwanzig" and would literally translate as "one-hundred-three-and-twenty". Actually we say 1, 3, 2 in German, which is by no means logical to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngarjuna
From the perspective of people who do primarily speak English, particularly people learning to speak/read/write (US schools), it would seem a better choice to reinforce the student's knowledge of the exceptions that they will be expected to know and use (first, second, third) and use the non-standard 1st, 2nd, 3rd. Because unlike writing 2th (which will be obvious and understood by most of the people reading it), asking "Who will go twoeth?" will get you a lot of funny looks.
|
Yes, because - as I wrote before - it is part of the culture.
-Data
|
|
|
03-17-2009, 12:53 PM
|
#22
|
up here in my tree
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: warehouse
Posts: 667
|
If you want to speak english, learn english.
It's not like China is making Chinese any easier for non-native speakers to learn?
|
|
|
03-17-2009, 05:56 PM
|
#23
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,373
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan
If you want to speak [E]nglish, learn [E]nglish.
It's not like China is making Chinese any easier for non-native speakers to learn?
|
Just chill no one is going to change the English language.
Besides do you really think that changing the ordinal indicator would make it anymore easier? I doubt. Besides that would only be a change in writing and not affect speaking at all ...
|
|
|
03-18-2009, 08:06 AM
|
#24
|
Human being with feelings
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 585
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrelwood
I've googled my ass sore
|
That's really disturbing. Is that the 1th time?
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:07 AM.
|